2017 03 02 TSC Meeting
Hyperledger Project
Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting
March 2, 2017 (7:00am - 8:00am PT) via GoToMeeting
TSC Members
Arnaud Le Hors | Yes |
Binh Nguyen | Yes |
Christopher Ferris | Yes |
Dan Middleton | Yes |
Greg Haskins | Yes |
Hart Montgomery | Yes |
Mic Bowman | Yes |
Murali Krishna Katipalli | Yes |
Richard Brown | Yes |
Sheehan Anderson | Yes |
Tamas Blummer | Yes |
Resources:
- Rocket.Chat: chat.hyperledger.org (you can use your LFID to login)
- Github: www.github.com/hyperledger
- Wiki: https://lf-hyperledger.atlassian.net
- Public lists: lists.hyperledger.org
- Information on the TSC Members can be found at https://www.hyperledger.org/about/tsc
- Meetings: wiki.hyperledger.org/community/calendar-public-meetings
Action Item Review
- Hackfest planning
- East Coast, week of April 24th (venue/city pending)
- Beijing, June TBD
- If you have venue space, please contact Todd Benzies tbenzies@linuxfoundation.org
- WG Charters
- Requirements WG (Oleg)
- Draft
- Requirements WG meeting on March 6th to finalize, the to TSC on March 9th to approve
- Brian B: re: disbanding note… see the need for this WG to be ongoing, there will always be new use cases worth considering, new releases worth mapping to those use cases.
- CF: re: collaboration -- need a way to engage Requirements WG with some industry-specific WGs, like Healthcare.
- DM: Near outset of Hyperledger, there was some reluctance from a few to share info within this WG as it was seen as valuable IP within some companies, we should work to continue to move the needle on this perception.
- Vipin: There has been movement in this direction. Suggest also adding to the use cases some actual implementations to showcase the round-trip phenomenon.
- slack-archive repo
- No objections to archiving the Slack. Ry to drive the process.
- Internship Program
- The subgroup met on February 28th and recommends the following 6 mentors/proposals
- Deploy Fabric on Kubernetes Using Cello, Feihu Jiang, Huawei
- Contract-based Business Process Execution / Hyperledger as a business process execution engine, László Gönczy, Budapest University of Technology and Economics
- Anonymous Transactions in Iroha, Makoto Takemiya and Bogdan Vaneev, Soramitsu
- Preserving Privacy with Sawtooth Lake, Dan Middleton, Intel
- Design and Implement Blockchain Clustering Platform for Hyperledger, Baohua Yang and Haitao Yue, IBM China
- Publish, Document, and Maintain a Distribution Agnostic Build Script, Mark Wagner, Red Hat
- No objections -- ok to move forward with these 6.
- Request to exit Incubation status for Hyperledger Fabric (here)
- Note: this isn’t about getting to 1.0, this is about maturity of “project,” not “product.“ That said, getting ready to cut an alpha this month.
- Q: What is the scope of Fabric? Does it include chaintool or Node-SDK, for example?
- CF: From an alignment perspective, all Fabric-** are aligned in getting to 1.0.
- Q: What is ongoing role for IBM? If IBM left would Fabric continue?
- CF: Year 1 goal was to get IBM under 50% of contributors (55% currently). Today, positive sign of seeing more sustained contributors (non-IBM). Ideally need to get down long-term number below 30% and get others more involved in Fabric. In addition, of the IBM contributions, they come from multiple teams within IBM (not just one silo).
- VOTE: Unanimously approved.
- GSL Discussion (Tamas Blummer)
Actions + On-going
- Hackfest planning (East Coast, week of April 24th / Beijing, June)
- Requirements WG Charter draft