| Who | Notes |
|---|
| - Performed review of prepared PRs
- Started maintenance subscription mechanism implementation
- Performed refactoring of configuration for different modules, grouped parameters semantically
- Tomorrow will put all day into the requirements definition
- On Monday it will be nice to finalize the list of requirements with Ales, Makoto and all other stakeholders by reviewing list of epics
|
| - Performed several review of the PRs and Reusable Data Model document from Михаил Болдырев
- Михаил Болдырев > There is an idea of interoperability, which is already taken by one of our interns
- Currently, we are collecting all WSV in memory
- There is also a proposal to change the synchronization mechanism from Egor, I have added some details about how it was performed in the first version
|
| - I have some questions to the synchronization mechanism, too. I think it can be done easier.
- We need to stick to the existing working solutions to avoid the re-engineering of the same mechanics, especially if it is working correctly.
- Currently we cannot review everything in design.
- Nikita Puzankov > Iroha 2 would not expected as a continuation of the Iroha 1 at the beginning.
- Egor Ivkov > Synchronization mechanism was based on the WP from 武宮誠 when he mentioned "gossip" explicitly
- Kamil Salakhiev > We need to get the input from Makoto to the RFC in the aim to finalize that
|
| - Started SecuroSys HSM integration in the Iroha 1.2.0. Currently waiting answer from the support, as they are providing quite strange documentation.
- Nikita Puzankov > Can we find another HSM provider which can fit us better.
- We need the feedback regarding the proposed data model interoperability between 1.x and 2.x
|
| - Finished initial block synchronization, created activity diagrams for the implemented feature.
- Waiting for review of code and diagrams
- Added RFC for the block synchronization mechanism
- There is a new task for block validation corrections, which is important. Started with it.
- Also, will continue with the configuration improvement.
- Waiting for the feedback on the block sync RFC from 武宮誠 and C++ team
- Makoto once requested REST API with JSON, should we accept it?
- Nikita Puzankov > It became outdated. We are going to prepare WASM library.
- Kamil Salakhiev > We need to create the convenient JS library for the clients, ideally.
|
| - Currently working on other tasks
- Will proceed with the RTD configuration of ToC once will finish with current tasks
|