2020-08-18 Meeting notes

@Nikita Puzankov

• Working on WP update and refactoring

• Worked on the RFC updates and creation

• Performed several discussions of RFC

• Need to have a review for the Data Model RFC, as it is quite important and describes big chunk of work

  • We need to understand the priorities and importance

• Provided knowledge sharing sessions with Andrey and Mikhail

• Planning to continue RFC discussion

• Planning to finish the PR with DSL implementation

@Михаил Болдырев

• There are no updates as I was involved in the Iroha 1.x fixes and internships

  • We need to make a presentation for full-time internships

• Planning to continue reviewing RFCs which require attention

  • Data Model

  • Permissions

  • Triggers

• Will dive into the code to start HSM implementation

@Egor Ivkov

• Completed transaction verification implementation

• Fixed the bug with async-std: it was related to async executors, which can be run inside other executors. 

  • Rolled back the version of async-std to stable version

• Started to implement HTTP and WebSocket interface for maintenance endpoint

  • Prepared the RFC with results of research of HTTP and WS libraries

  • We need to review and make a decision

• Spent a lot of time on reviewing Permissions and Triggers RFCs

• Participated in several RFC-related discussions

• Will continue working on maintenance endpoint

@andrew.nikitin

• Today started with reviewing Permissions

• Make some models of Data Mode RFC

  • Started the HL Transact review and see how it can be integrated into Iroha 2

• Will proceed with Data Model RFC

• Will finish the Consensus API RFC to prepare it for discussion

• Will proceed with reviewing Triggers and Permissions

@Kamil Salakhiev

• Reviewed RFC of Merkle trees

  • We got feedback from Ruslan, we need to support Merkle tree for transactions and WSV

  • We need to proceed with the decision

• Reviewed RFC about triggers and permissions

  • Need to dive deeper into the terminology

• @Andrei Lebedev : Transact have out-of-the-box support for the Merkle trees for transactions

  • It is a generalization of the Data Model idea

@武宮誠

• It is important to speed up some decisions for MVP; we have many ideas ready, but just need to stick to the reasonable solution

  • Design is really important, I am always happy to participate