2020-05-26 Status meeting notes

2020-05-26 Status meeting notes

Date

May 26, 2020

Attendees

Discussion items

Who

Notes

Who

Notes

Vadim Reutskiy

  • We are planning to release Iroha 1.2 in two weeks, hence the C++ team will join after it.

2020-05-26 Status meeting notes

 

  • Reviewed RFC for Iroha 2 bridge model

  • Created RFC for permissions and event listeners. It is blocker right now, as our internal project needs triggers. We need to decide on the aim to proceed with projects development

  • Reviewed the PR form Egor

  • On the current week, we would not have the demo, as we have a very small delta.

  • We need to discuss permissions and I will start working on them

  • After permissions, I will start making an event triggers. There is a request from Iurii. The team of our new internal project will start working with the project from the next week.

 

 2020-05-26 Status meeting notes

 

  • Made a PR for the block structure change, we merged it (according to the discussion in chat)

  • Have improved false-proxy issue in Sumeragi, improve block-timeout

  • Currently working on the integration tests, making them green again

  • I need to have further discussion in chat

  • I will manage to look and review the permissions RFC

  • 2020-05-26 Status meeting notes > What you think about creating an article about Sumeragi to the conference? The link is in Reading club. I can start with the draft, but we need test and simulation results.

    • 2020-05-26 Status meeting notes > Getting feedback is really important, especially the conference when people can understand the consensus

    • 2020-05-26 Status meeting notes  > We need to create a document with detailed consensus description, and I have a person who can help us with scientific proof

    • Egor will try to help with the experimental data

 

@Kamil Salakhiev

  • Reviewed documents of our internal project.

  • Will provide a review of permissions and ISI. I made a brief review, and currently, it looks good. Will take a deeper look and send comments

@武宮誠

  • We need to unblock Nikita and review the permissions RFC.

  • We need to run benchmarks for the network with enabled consensus. I will try to look in it and provide more data.

  • I am trying to create an overall design, there are few unsolved problems on the high level

Action items

@武宮誠 @Kamil Salakhiev @Egor Ivkov : review the permissions and ISI RFC