2020-09-03 Meeting notes

2020-09-03 Meeting notes

Date

Sep 3, 2020

Attendees

  • @Vadim Reutskiy

  • @Nikita Puzankov

  • @Egor Ivkov

  • @Andrei Lebedev

  • @Михаил Болдырев

  • @Kamil Salakhiev

  • @Sara Garifullina

  • @武宮誠

Discussion items

Who

Notes

@Vadim Reutskiy

  • Nikita and Egor temporarily moves to help of implementation of internal project

  • We collected requirements from Sora 2 project

 @Kamil Salakhiev

  • No significant updates 

@Andrei Lebedev

  • Published the draft of the review of extensible serialization

  • Need to proceed with further analysis and describe details of approaches

  • The approach of use cases is questionable, but we can make a draft of all use cases and the divide them according to the particular project's

@Михаил Болдырев

  • Worked on the understanding of the code

  • We need to discuss the modular crypto DSL

  • Working on the 1.2.0 release, the database connection issue. Found the quick and dirty solution.

@Nikita Puzankov

  • Conducted the DSL demo session

  • Implemented RFC for maintenance and configuration

  • Created the issue to implement the configuration during the runtime → new RFC which is ready to be reviewed

  • Made an RFC about naming

@Egor Ivkov

  • Working on the migration of the Torii API and client crate to the HTTP protocol.

    • Today worked on the improvements on PR.

    • WebSocket is not ready, will be implemented later, after returning from the internal project.

  • Reviewed PRs of Nikita

  • If we decide on naming, we should publish ASAP

@Sara Garifullina

  • Working on the documentation, improving by instructions from readme's 

  • Discussed the details with Stephan

  • Member Summit question is still under consideration, as there are not so much concreteness

Stephan Lavrentev

  • Performing additional tests of existing issues on the Longevity test

  • Doing exploratory testing

  • Added PR to add some instructions to CLI

  • There are some questions about the transfers – we need to add details to it

@武宮誠

  • We need to have the possibility to add the payload to a transaction and to assets definitions (additional UCs)

    • Size should be configurable

  • We should add UCs for the supply chain and related RFC

Action items

@Vadim Reutskiy: add UCs for attaching payload to instructions and UCs from the supply chain application