2019-07-15 Indy Maintainers Call
Summary
Discussed release status of various dependent components
GitLab migration still in progress
What to do about IndySDK→AriesSDK+IndyResolver migration
C Callable Wrappers and Rust
Anoncreds 2.0
Schema 2.0
Documentation updates
Call to contribute or deprecate out of date documentation
Discussion on Indy WG call becoming an Identity WG Implementers call
Timezone: US afternoon and Asia morning
Remember the Hyperledger Code of Conduct
Anti-Trust Policy
Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.
Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy. If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.
Attendees
@Nathan George (Sovrin Foundation) <nage@sovrin.org>
@Kyle Den Hartog (Mattr) <kyle.denhartog@mattr.global>
@Tobias Looker (Mattr) <tobias.looker@mattr.global>
@Adam Burdett (Sovrin Foundation) <adam@sovrin.org>
@Sam Curren (Sovrin Foundation) <sam@sovrin.org>
@Stephen Curran (Cloud Compass/BC Gov) <swcurran@cloudcompass.ca>
@Ken Ebert (Sovrin Foundation) <ken@sovrin.org>
@Camilo Parra (Kiva) <camilop@kiva.org>
@Alan Krassowski (Kiva) <alank@kiva.org>
Name (organization) <email>
Announcements
Summary of Prior Call
Release Status
Indy Node
Early July: 1.9.0 Pluggable Request Handlers
CI / CD problems left us broken for days. Release is likely to be next week.
July: 1.9.1
Bug fix release
Still trying for late July
August: 1.9.2
Bug fix release
September: 1.10.0
PBFT view change
Indy SDK
Early July: Indy SDK 1.10.0
Flexible Credential Attribute Tagging (BC.gov)
Bugfixes
CI / CD problems left us broken for days. Release is likely to be late this week.
Late July:
Usability improvements to Indy CLI and Payments (Sovrin Foundation and Evernym)
Requires concurrent release with libsovtoken
GitLab migration alongside Jenkins (Foundation)?
Linux should be ready, maybe Windows.
Need a plan for mobile devices.
Could run it right after the release.
LibVCX without agency (Evernym)
August
Platform Updates (Evernym?)
Aries / Indy split
Anoncreds 2.0 (Sovrin Foundation, BC.gov?)
Ursa
June: 0.1.2
Exposing the existing functionality over a C-API for the Aroha team.
Not tagged in GitHub
July: 0.2.0
Refactor internal plumbing for anoncreds 2.0, shouldn't impact external interfaces
Multi-signature BLS instead of aggregated signature
Aries
Agent from Indy Catalyst migrated to aries-cloudagent-python (BC.gov)
Initial code migration from SDK repositories
Indy Catalyst
Migration from BC repos this week.
Indy WG call - proposal to rebrand to Identity WG or Sovrin call to cover cross-project concerns (keep it every week and report on various project WG status and talk about cross-project issues and end-to-end integrations).
Work Updates
Documentation improvements: Michael B and Stephen C
Start with new developer path through Aries.
First draft in aries-cloudagent-python from 0 to coding in Aries
Need to review and prune out-of-date documentation (Alice / Faber treatment of pairwise DIDs is a key pain point)
Michael is working on Indy Agent walkthrough using C#
SDK 2.0 architecture / Indy-Aries split (Sergey)
GitLab migration (Mike and Steve G)
Evaluated Circle CI, but it doesn't support Windows
Blocking various platform updates and CI / CD improvements
Warnings from rust cargo clippy (Mike)
IS-1270 through IS-1274
Will look at again in July
New design for revocation / Anoncreds 2.0 (Mike)
Would be useful to have a comparison in performance between Anoncreds 1.0 and Anoncreds 2.0
First draft is latex document in Ursa repo. Will be published as PDF and HTML.
Need a plan for changes to Indy Node
HIPE for overall changes, then a design PR for the changes specific to the different repos.
https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/tree/master/design