2024-03-20 Aries Working Group Call

2024-03-20 Aries Working Group Call

Summary:

  • PR Review

  • DIDComm v2 Credential protocol updates

  • Basis for common identifiers

Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/93803916577?pwd=UWdLSTJ2b0kvZTRyc1hZTUdQQ3ZFZz09

Recording:

Date

Mar 20, 2024 (7AM Los Angeles, 10AM New York, 3PM London, 4PM CET, 18H Moscow)

 

 

Hyperledger is committed to creating a safe and welcoming

community for all. For more information

please visit the Hyperledger Code of Conduct.

 

Hyperledger is committed to creating a safe and welcoming

community for all. For more information

please visit the Hyperledger Code of Conduct.

Attendees

  • @Sam Curren  (Indicio) <sam@indicio.tech>

  • @Ariel Gentile (2060.io) <a@2060.io>

Welcome / Introductions

Announcements

  • IIW - April 16-18

  • Lots of BC Ledgers, all but BSovrinTest. Genesis now all points to the same ledger.

Release Status and Work Updates

Discussion Topics

  • OpenID DIDComm work by IDUnion

  • Ecosystem Diagram / Document 

  • PR Review

    • 821 - Update DID Exchange Examples

    • 820 - Update AIP 2 to latest clarification commits, remove static peer dids

    • 819 - Update Index and remove github action

    • 818 - removes references to please ack from other protocols

    • 812 - OOB compression

      • will this eliminate the need for http redirects?

        • qr code size

        • bandwidth reduction

        • connectionless - messages can be large.

      • Interest? Strong Maybe.

  • DIDComm v2 conversion

    • (Notes from previous weeks)

      • Smaller changes may mean faster adoption

      • negotiation pulled out into a sibling protocol - (nobody using negotation? Subhasis referenced use.)

        • propose message moves to different family.

      • Document the short-circuted use of the protocol that starts at issuance directly, depending on needs of credential type.

      • we need to be careful not to match protocol to UX human steps on a 1 to 1 basis

      • abandoned state - if a user declines to present, what should happen between the holder and verifier?

        • problem report sent (or no message, see below) on decline - should be documented

      • explicit 'no' messages instead of a problem report when it's an explicit no, instead of an error.

      • document use of timeout for offers (didcomm v2 friendly, perhaps a field within the protocol.Credential Protocols for DIDComm v2

    • Any Volunteers?

  • Basis for common identifiers

Other Business

Future Topics

  • Niels Klomp offered a deeper dive into the openid4vc related flows

  • decorator for redirection after proofs. - existing?

  • in the Aug 9 call there was talk about EUDI compatibility. Maybe tracking the progress every now and then in these calls? Has there been any discussion about adding SD-JWT and OID4VC stuff to Aries Interop test suite?

Action items

Call Recording: