2020-02-24 Indy Contributors Call

Summary

We intend to record this call.

Remember the Hyperledger Code of Conduct

Anti-Trust Policy

Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.

Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy. If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.

Introductions

Attendees

• Name (Organization) <email>

Related Calls and Announcements

• Going forward, we will not be holding the AMER afternoon / APAC morning call
• Identity Implementors Working Group call
  • Main place to get project updates, release status, and announcements.
• Call to discuss techniques for supporting an Indy Network: Tuesday, February 25 at 3PM UTC

Release Status and Work Updates

• Indy Node
  • February:
    • Replacing Indy Crypto with Ursa (Kiva)
    • More "rich schema" objects
    • Tool for detecting ZMQ network problems
    • Troubleshooting guide
  • Future
    • Ubuntu 18.04 (Kiva)
      • Need to check additional dependencies: 
        Error rendering macro 'jira' : null
• Indy SDK
  • February:
    • Bug fixes
• Indy Catalyst
  • https://github.com/bcgov/indy-catalyst
  • Migrating to Hyperledger Aries: plan is to moving to aries-verified-credential-registry
    
    • Needs more documentation
• Anoncreds 2.0 (Mike)
  • Implementing in an Aries Shared Library
• Aries Shared Libraries
  • indy-vdr (Andrew Whitehead) https://github.com/andrewwhitehead/indy-ledger-client
    • HTTP REST client that can be used to proxy ZMQ traffic
    • Next steps:
      • VDR Design Doc
      • FFI
      • Unit tests
      • Functional tests
      • Migrate repo to Hyperledger
        • First commit should point to previous history in indy-sdk
      • Integrate into existing LibIndy
        
        • Apply recent bug fixes to the new VDRI
    • As an Aries interface becomes standardized, a new repo will be created for the indy-aries-vdri
      • Or a single aries-vdri with modules for each interoperable ledger
  • indy-aries-anoncreds / indy-creds → indy-credx
    • Mike has started. Repo for Aries cred exchange framework.
      https://github.com/sovrin-foundation/aries-credx-framework-rs
    • As an Aries interface becomes standardized, a new repo would be created for the indy-aries-credx?
    • Goal is to make the current anocreds a separate component, then work on anoncreds 2
    • Microsoft might be taking a different approach to ZKP revocation
      https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/550.pdf
  • Aries-Shared-Util
    • Pack / Unpack
      • Lift-and-shift would be Indy specific, but refactoring for Aries-KMS could take a long time
    • Need a place for Rich Schemas functions → many will go to Aries Credx
  • Aries-KMS
  • Mike and Cam's aries-core-rs → aries-kms-(placeholder)
    https://github.com/sovrin-foundation/aries-core-rs
    • Evolution from lox
    • Will include a default storage that is not a different implementation from the plugins
    • Hopes for a protype in February
  • Move the Indy wallet crate as a starting point → aries-kms-taiga
• Ursa 0.3.2
  • Releasing this week?
  • Implements key exchange, so LibSodium hopefully is no longer required

Main Business

• Need to decide the future of CI / CD
  • Need CI / CD for indy-vdr immediately
  • Jenkins infrastructure is aging
  • GitLab environment isn't functional
  • Hyperledger is using Azure Pipelines, but concerns about running an Indy Pool there

Future Calls

Next call:

Future:

• Requirements questions:
  • IS-1099: anoncreds.prover_get_credentials_for_proof_req should return per-credential timestamp
    • Should we allow duplicate credentials from the same issuer?

Action items

• HIPE #138, Issue #144 (Ken and Brent)
  
  • Create a PR for changing status to ACCEPTED
  • Check for an Aries RFC
• PR to RFC #0019 to compare pack/upack to msgpack (Sergey)
• Richard and Sergey will close old pull requests with a descriptive comment.
• Mike wants to review the 61 cases of "unsafe" libindy calls and figure out if they are justified.

Call Recording