Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Date

Attendees

Discussion items

WhoNotes

Andrei Lebedev

  • Will manage weekly status meetings with all interns in the aim to keep the pace of development
  • Reviewed the RFC for MST, there is nothing new there. Also, there are some overcomplications. Will do comments to the RFC according to my vision.
    • Then we can discuss it with the whole team on the project discussion session
  • Will check the PR for Iroha and discuss it with Mikhail
  • Did not participate in the discussion about linking libraries.
  • No new updates on the proposal for Iroha 2 regarding modular structure.

Михаил Болдырев

  • There are 2 solutions to the library linkage issue:
    • PR to our modified crypto library in the aim to add C++ interface to the existing C one
    • Another - is to add patch to vcpkg which will add the prefix to the names of the library
  • There is also a question regarding the Utimaco integration. Not clear about the library distribution approach. Can we distribute current simulation package or Utimaco will have another one? 
    • Andrei Lebedev > Is there any information about that package on the public Utimaco website? We need to check it and if it is available, we can use it in the Docker image.
    • We need to decide about the approach for deploy.
  • Ready to proceed with the SecuroSys integration, will dig into the documentation
  • Will try to proceed with the proposal of the modular approach and gradual switch form the Iroha 1 → Iroha 2

Sara Garifullina

  • There is one issue in the community regarding the Iroha. Waiting for the response from the member.

Action items

  • No labels