Versions Compared

Old Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Markus Sabadello

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Paul

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Summary

Excerpt
  • Review of decisions to date
  • Discussion (led by Paul) about transforming NYM and ATTRIB data into a DIDDoc
    • What goes into the ATTRIB and how does it manifest in the DIDDoc?

Recording from the call:

...

 20210105 Indy DID Method Specification Call Recording

Hyperledger is committed to creating a safe and welcoming

community for all. For more information

please visit the Hyperledger Code of Conduct.

Welcome and Introductions

...

Collaboration Channels

...

  • Last meeting we talked about the easy cases:
    • NYM and no ATTRIB
    • NYM and ATTRIB only with an "endpoint" URL.
  • What about more interesting cases? Paulto facilitate the discussion.DIDDocs:

      Future Discussions:

        • See notes at the end of the HackMD Document
        • Do we do validation checking on the known ATTRIB raw types? yes - where possible
        • Where does the DIDDoc construction occur? Must happen on the ledger.

      Future Discussions:

      • DNR and DND discussions
      •  DIDDocs:
        • What is the structure of the DIDDoc template - core and extensions?
      • Structure for Indy specific objects returned as DIDs
        • What is the DID?
        • What is the DIDDoc format?
        • Existing objects – backwards compatibility
          • DID vs. DID URL – how could that be done?