Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Summary

Excerpt
  • Issue 102: AnonCreds object signed by the key of the publisher
  • Latest with AnonCreds W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model Standard
  • Update on prover_did?
  • Progress on the anoncreds_rs implementation
  • Open Discussion

Recording of Call:   dummyfile.txt

Notices: 

This specification creating group operates under the Linux Foundation Community Specification License v1.0.

Hyperledger is committed to creating a safe and welcoming

community for all. For more information

please visit the Hyperledger Code of Conduct.

Meeting Attendees

Stephen Curran (BC Gov / Cloud Compass Computing Inc.) <swcurran@cloudcompass.ca>

Lance Byrd (RootsID) <lance.byrd@rootsid.com>

Rodolfo Miranda (RootsID)<rodolfo.miranda@rootsid.com>

Steve McCown (Anonyome Labs)<smccown@anonyome.com>


Related Repositories:

...

  • Issue 102: AnonCreds object signed by the key of the publisher
    • Which is related to Issue 74: issuer_did and schema_issuer_did should be IDs?
    • Action: Add issuerId and schemaIssuerId to the appropriate objects; add a task to the anoncreds_rs to do the same.
  • Latest on the AnonCreds W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model Standard
    • Is it wrong to format an AnonCreds credential in the W3C Format?
  • Any update on what "prover_did" is used for during AnonCreds processing.  Notably, does the value require any special characteristics when it is used in the AnonCreds code?
    • Any insight on why it was added in the first place?
    • If we were to deprecate it as an input, would we need to use something else to replace it in the AnonCreds code?
  • Help with dependabot pull request: 113
  • Checkin: anoncreds-rs implementation progress, requests
  • Open Discussion

...