Summary
Excerpt |
---|
|
Recording from the call: <TO BE ADDED>
Hyperledger is committed to creating a safe and welcoming community for all. For more information please visit the Hyperledger Code of Conduct. |
---|
Welcome and Introductions
...
- What is in a NYM state proof and if it can be "easily" extended
- Serialization formats
This Week's Discussion:
- From last week's discussion – confirmation of approach:
- Update the NYM to add a "diddocContent" item that is the equivalent of what we proposed would go in the DIDDoc ATTRIB, with assembly left to the client
- Include support for the version_id and version_time resolution parameters.
- Confirm error checking done on the NYM write. See proposal in the hackmd document (valid JSON, no NYM fields, valid DIDDoc)
- Other options rejected
- Have a single call that gets the NYM and ATTRIB and state proofs for both with same multi-signed merkle root, and leave the assembly to the client.
- Likely choice if extending the NYM is impractical
- Do nothing
- Single call with both state proofs and ledger does assembly
- Write DIDDoc on ledger writes and have state proof for DIDDoc
- Add WRITE_DIDDOC transaction transactio
- Have a single call that gets the NYM and ATTRIB and state proofs for both with same multi-signed merkle root, and leave the assembly to the client.
- Update the NYM to add a "diddocContent" item that is the equivalent of what we proposed would go in the DIDDoc ATTRIB, with assembly left to the client
- Serialization formats
- Decision on assembly points of concern:
- The "nymKeyAgreement" flag
- Remove the "content" item and just inline the rest of the ATTRIB?
- Other Indy Ledger Objects as DIDs (e.g. schema, etc):
- Drummonds proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f99z4Bf8F-DA8EbkNjInVQv2ncJGPwF_Dp7I7Mfyhqs/edit
- Existing transactions
...