Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 55 Next »

General info

Target releaseIroha 2.0 MVP
Document status
DRAFT
Document owner
Tech lead

TBD

Developers
Blockchain advisors

Kamil SalakhievAndrei Lebedev, Bulat Nasrullin, 

Stakeholders
QAStephan Lavrentev

Goals

  • TBD

Background and strategic fit

TBD

Sources

Assumptions

  • TBD

Table of contents

Changes history

 History of changes
Version Date Comment
Current Version (v. 55) Sept 08, 2020 22:36 Vadim Reutskiy:
Added response and measure to the NFR0002
v. 100 Sept 22, 2020 23:39 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 99 Sept 22, 2020 23:37 Vadim Reutskiy
Reviewed and fixed some FRs, added links to related FRs.
v. 98 Sept 22, 2020 22:54 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 97 Sept 22, 2020 22:51 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 96 Sept 19, 2020 06:07 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 95 Sept 19, 2020 05:55 Vadim Reutskiy
Added NFR0103 about flexibility of permissions
v. 94 Sept 19, 2020 05:30 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 93 Sept 19, 2020 05:28 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 92 Sept 19, 2020 05:21 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 91 Sept 19, 2020 05:20 Vadim Reutskiy
Added NFR0103 about convenient API
v. 90 Sept 19, 2020 03:44 Vadim Reutskiy
Added FR0217 with custom query language
v. 89 Sept 19, 2020 03:43 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 88 Sept 19, 2020 03:35 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 87 Sept 19, 2020 03:25 Vadim Reutskiy
Added NFR0400 with requirement to verifiable and repeatable documentation about decisions
v. 86 Sept 19, 2020 03:18 Vadim Reutskiy
Added NFR0300 about documentation
v. 85 Sept 19, 2020 02:45 Vadim Reutskiy
Added NFD0004 about network capacity for accounts
v. 84 Sept 19, 2020 02:44 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 83 Sept 19, 2020 02:30 Vadim Reutskiy
Filled FR0902 about access delegation
v. 82 Sept 19, 2020 02:19 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 81 Sept 19, 2020 02:09 Vadim Reutskiy
Added FR0114 and FR0216 about non-fungible assets
v. 80 Sept 19, 2020 01:08 Vadim Reutskiy
Added FR0114 about operations with non-fungible assets
v. 79 Sept 19, 2020 00:50 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 78 Sept 16, 2020 04:29 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 77 Sept 16, 2020 04:08 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 76 Sept 16, 2020 04:06 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 75 Sept 16, 2020 03:52 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 74 Sept 11, 2020 05:29 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 73 Sept 11, 2020 05:22 Vadim Reutskiy
Add FR0907 with non-fungible tokens
v. 72 Sept 11, 2020 02:51 Vadim Reutskiy
Update FR0300: add note about reusing the same state.
v. 71 Sept 11, 2020 02:46 Vadim Reutskiy
Update FR0904 according to comments by Iurii
v. 70 Sept 11, 2020 02:28 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 69 Sept 11, 2020 01:17 Vadim Reutskiy
Add NFR0102 about DSL flexibility
v. 68 Sept 11, 2020 00:53 Vadim Reutskiy
Added FR0906 for parliament voting
v. 67 Sept 10, 2020 23:50 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 66 Sept 10, 2020 23:47 Vadim Reutskiy
Added FR0905 with management of MST signatories
v. 65 Sept 10, 2020 05:52 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 64 Sept 10, 2020 05:30 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 63 Sept 10, 2020 05:05 Vadim Reutskiy
Added NFR0102 with requirements to system performance flexibility
v. 62 Sept 10, 2020 04:59 Vadim Reutskiy
Added performance requirements from Sora 2
v. 61 Sept 10, 2020 04:57 Vadim Reutskiy
Added NFR0003 with requirements to the minimal machine configuration
v. 60 Sept 10, 2020 01:22 Vadim Reutskiy
Added NFR0101 for network scalability
v. 59 Sept 10, 2020 01:02 Vadim Reutskiy
Added security requirements NFR0200
v. 58 Sept 09, 2020 23:46 Vadim Reutskiy
Added quality attribute for SDK availability for platforms (NFR0100)
v. 57 Sept 08, 2020 23:36 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 56 Sept 08, 2020 23:32 Vadim Reutskiy
Added details to the FR0903
v. 55 Sept 08, 2020 22:36 Vadim Reutskiy
Added response and measure to the NFR0002
v. 54 Sept 08, 2020 05:30 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 53 Sept 03, 2020 23:49 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 52 Sept 03, 2020 23:48 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 51 Sept 03, 2020 23:47 Vadim Reutskiy
Add FR0113 - sending instructions with payload
v. 50 Sept 03, 2020 23:34 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 49 Sept 03, 2020 05:26 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 48 Sept 03, 2020 04:46 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 47 Sept 03, 2020 04:26 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 46 Sept 03, 2020 04:00 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 45 Sept 03, 2020 03:23 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 44 Sept 03, 2020 01:03 Vadim Reutskiy
Added section for high-level use cases and FR0900 and FR0901 about the fees configuration and application
v. 43 Sept 02, 2020 23:32 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 42 Sept 02, 2020 23:27 Vadim Reutskiy
Added use case for selecting list of transactions FR0214
v. 41 Sept 02, 2020 23:19 Vadim Reutskiy
Update list of participants and roles
v. 40 Sept 02, 2020 23:16 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 39 Sept 02, 2020 23:14 Vadim Reutskiy
Added use cases for CRUD operations of data associated with the account: FR0212, FR0213, FR0112
v. 38 Sept 02, 2020 22:54 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 37 Sept 02, 2020 02:03 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 36 Sept 02, 2020 01:13 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 35 Sept 01, 2020 23:53 Vadim Reutskiy
Added FR0211
v. 34 Sept 01, 2020 23:31 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 33 Sept 01, 2020 23:24 Vadim Reutskiy
Added trigger-related use cases: FR0300-FR0302
v. 32 Sept 01, 2020 04:43 Kamil Salakhiev
v. 31 Aug 30, 2020 04:41 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 30 Aug 30, 2020 04:01 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 29 Aug 30, 2020 02:49 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 28 Aug 30, 2020 02:45 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 27 Aug 30, 2020 02:43 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 26 Aug 27, 2020 04:44 Kamil Salakhiev
v. 25 Aug 27, 2020 04:25 Bogdan Mingela
v. 24 Aug 27, 2020 00:56 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 23 Aug 26, 2020 23:52 Vadim Reutskiy
Added "source" field to all use cases
v. 22 Aug 26, 2020 02:52 Bogdan Mingela
v. 21 Aug 26, 2020 02:19 Iurii Vinogradov
v. 20 Aug 26, 2020 02:14 Iurii Vinogradov
v. 19 Aug 26, 2020 02:02 Kamil Salakhiev
v. 18 Aug 26, 2020 02:00 Kamil Salakhiev
v. 17 Aug 25, 2020 03:57 Vadim Reutskiy
Added FR0208, Subscribing on the query results
v. 16 Aug 25, 2020 03:46 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 15 Aug 25, 2020 03:45 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 14 Aug 25, 2020 03:45 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 13 Aug 25, 2020 03:41 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 12 Aug 25, 2020 03:41 Bogdan Mingela
blocks and pending transactions cases
v. 11 Aug 25, 2020 01:01 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 10 Aug 25, 2020 00:42 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 9 Aug 24, 2020 23:53 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 8 Aug 24, 2020 23:30 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 7 Aug 24, 2020 23:06 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 6 Aug 24, 2020 23:04 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 5 Aug 24, 2020 05:26 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 4 Aug 24, 2020 05:24 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 3 Aug 24, 2020 05:22 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 2 Aug 24, 2020 01:05 Vadim Reutskiy
v. 1 Aug 24, 2020 00:00 Vadim Reutskiy

Requirements

Actors

Actor nameRole definition
The Iroha peerOne of active peers of the Iroha network, accessible by network for the current user.
The administratorThe user of the Iroha network with the extended rights towards manipulating the peers and network configuration
The userGeneric user of the Iroha network with common list of permissions (required permissions are always mentioned in the use case preconditions)

Functional requirements

For describing functional requirements, we should follow the default use case template by example:

Use case title
[FR0000] Example use-case; ID should be unique
Status

DISCUSS

DECIDED

POSTPONE

SourceSource (or list of sources) of the function: project name / stakeholder name / document title (e.g., whitepaper) / etc.
Preconditions
  • List of preconditions which must be satisfied before the use case can be applied
  • Each precondition should be defined as the point in the list

Use case flow

  1. The enumerated list of actions, which describes the interaction between actors step by step
  2. Each step should involve a single actor as an object of the action
  3. Each step can involve one or more actors as a subject of the action
  4. Each use case can involve other use cases as dependencies by include or extend relationships
Postconditions
  • One or more results of successfully finished use case
Alternative flow
  • List of alternative flows that can happen with the use case.
  • Each entry should have the link to the step of the main use case flow when the alternative can occur
    • If needed, each entry can contain sub-entries
  • Each entry should describe the consequences of the alternative flow
Exception flow
  • List of exceptions that can happen during the use case flow, which can prevent it to be successfully finished
  • Each entry should have the link to the step of the main use case flow when the exception can occur
    • If needed, each entry can contain sub-entries
  • Each entry should describe the consequences of the exception

Use case ID formula

Assuming, that each section would not have more than 100 use cases, the use case ID should be formed using that template:

FR<section_number><use_case_number_in_section_starting_from_zero>

For example, for second use case in section 02 it should be:

FR0201

00. Iroha network operations

❇️❇️❇️

In this section all use cases related to generic operations with Iroha network and peers will be described


Use case title
[FR0001] Starting the Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The administrator has configured environment for running Iroha executables
  • The administrator has prepared the genesis block

Use case flow

  1. The administrator launches the command to run Iroha peer and providing the path to the genesis block description
  2. The Iroha peer read and validates the genesis block configuration
  3. The Iroha peer starts the Iroha network according to the configuration in the genesis block
  4. The Iroha peer provides "successfully started" report to the administrator
Postconditions
  • The Iroha network is running
  • The administrator has access to the root account of the network
Alternative flow

N/A

Exception flow
  • At step 2, in case of the invalid genesis block, the Iroha peer shows corresponding error messages to the administrator and halts the network creation process
Use case title
[FR0002] Adding peer to the Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The Iroha network is running
  • The administrator has access to the account with permissions of adding peers to the network

Use case flow

  1. The administrator configures and starts the new peer
  2. The administrator prepares the transaction with instruction to add the new peer
  3. The administrator sends the prepared transaction to the existing Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  4. The existing Iroha peer initiates connection with the new Iroha peer
  5. The new Iroha peer synchronizes the block-storage with existing Iroha peers
  6. The new Iroha peer start functioning as fully functional peer in the current Iroha network
Postconditions
  • The new peer is added into the network
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 5, if the synchronization cannot be finished for some reason, the new Iroha peer cannot join the network; use case stops
Use case title
[FR0003] Removing peer from the Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The administrator has access to the account with permission of removing peers form the network

Use case flow

  1. The administrator prepares the instruction to remove the peer from the Iroha network
  2. The administrator sends the transaction with the prepared instruction to the Iroha peer
  3. The Iroha peer confirms the execution of the instruction
Postconditions
  • The target peer is removed from the current Iroha network and all processes in consensus continues without it
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flowN/A
Use case title
[FR0004] Configuring initial state of the Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions

Use case flow


Postconditions
Alternative flow
Exception flow
Use case title
[FR0005] Changing configuration of working Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The administrator has access to account with permissions to change the network configuration by sending the corresponding instruction

Use case flow

  1. The administrator prepares the data for the instruction for changing the overall Iroha network configuration
  2. The administrator sends the transaction with prepared instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  3. The Iroha peer return the results of instruction execution to the administrator.
Postconditions
  • The network configuration is changed correspondingly
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow

N/A

Use case title
[FR0006] Changing configuration of the particular peer
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The administrator has access to the maintenance endpoint of the target Iroha peer

Use case flow

  1. The administrator connects to the maintenance endpoint of the target Iroha peer
  2. The administrator performs requests to change required parameters of the target Iroha peer
  3. The Iroha peer returns result of change operation to the administrator
Postconditions
  • The configuration of the target Iroha peer was changed
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if the value of changed configuration parameter is out of the limit, the Iroha peer will return "wrong parameter value" error status to the administrator; use case flow stops.

01. Making changes in Iroha network data by Iroha special instructions

❇️❇️❇️

In this section all use cases related to changing data in the Iroha network will be described


Use case title
[FR0100] Sending the transaction to the Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has an account in the Iroha network
  • The user has prepared the transaction for sending; transactions can consist of several instructions
  • The user has permissions to execute all instruction included in the transaction
  • The Iroha network is working in normal condition

Use case flow

  1. The user sends the transaction to the Iroha peer through the API
  2. The Iroha peer receives the transaction and validates its contents
  3. The Iroha peer checks that the user's account have enough permissions to run all instructions included in the transaction
  4. The Iroha peer executes the transaction by applying it to the current block
  5. The Iroha peer returns the result of the operation to the user
Postconditions
  • The transaction is successfully executed and applied to the network state
Alternative flow
  • On step 4, if the current user's account is multi-signature, the result of the transaction will be applied to the block-store only when the number of signatures will reach the current quorum value. In other cases, the Iroha peer will return "pending" status as a response on step 5.
Exception flow
  • On step 2, one of the instructions has invalid structure, the Iroha peer returns an error message with description to the user and stops the flow
  • On step 3, if the user's account does not have required permissions to execute one of the instructions, the Iroha peer returns information about that error and stops the flow
  • On step 3, in case of a multi-signature transaction, if the instruction signed using the key pair, which was already used for signing that instruction, the Iroha peer will return "already signed" error status and stop the flow
Use case title
[FR0101] Creation of the account in the Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permission to create accounts

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares information about the account that should be created, which includes name, domain, the public key and permissions list
  2. The user prepares instruction to send to the Iroha network according to the prepared information
  3. The user sends the transaction with the instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  4. The Iroha peer returns the result of the instruction execution to the user
Postconditions
  • The new account in the Iroha network is created
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if the account with the provided name or public key already exists in the network, the Iroha peer will return "already exists" error status; user case flow will stop.
Use case title
[FR0102] Configuring permissions for the account in the Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has access to the Iroha account with permissions to change permissions of the target account

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares information about set of permissions, which should be enabled or disabled for the target account
  2. The user prepares instruction to send to the Iroha network according to the prepared information
  3. The user sends the transaction with the instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  4. The Iroha peer returns the result of the instruction execution to the user
Postconditions
  • The permissions of the target account was changed correspondingly
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 4, if the user disables the permission which is not enables on the target account, the Iroha peer return "Permission is not enabled" error status; use case flow stops
  • On step 4, if the user enables the permission which is already enabled on the target account, the Iroha peer return "Permission already enabled" error status; use case flow stops
Use case title
[FR0102] Granting permissions for the account in the Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has access to his/her account in the Iroha network
  • The user's account has permissions to provide grantable permissions

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the instruction to grant one or more permissions to another account
  2. The user sends the transaction with the prepared instruction to the Iroha peer (<<includes>> FR0100)
  3. The Iroha peer returns the result of the instruction to the user
Postconditions
  • The permission was granted to another account
Alternative flow
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if the user does not have permission to grant permissions to other accounts, the Iroha peer will return "Not permitted" error status; use case flow stops
Use case title
[FR0104] Sending complex instruction using ISI DSL
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to send complex instructions with DSL sequence inside
  • The user has permissions to execute each instruction inside the list of DSL sequence

Use case flow

  1. The user builds the DSL sequence for the complex instruction
  2. The user prepares the complex instruction to send to the Iroha peer
  3. The user sends the complex instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  4. The Iroha peer returns the results of complex instruction execution to the user
Postconditions
  • The complex instruction was executed and applied to the Iroha network
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 4, of there is not enough permissions to execute whole DSL sequence, the Iroha peer will return "not enough permissions" error status; use case flow stops.
Use case title
[FR0105] Sending instruction and subscribing to the status of finalization
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to execute requested instruction

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the instruction parameters according to his/her needs
  2. The user sends the transaction with the instruction into the Iroha peer (<<includes>> FR0100)
  3. The user uses the same connection for obtaining the status of the instruction finalization
  4. The Iroha peer sends updates about the instruction finalization status to the user
  5. The user receives the "successfully finalized" status about the instruction
Postconditions
  • The instruction is accepted and finalized in the block-storage
  • The user did not spend additional resources for redundant network connections and requests
Alternative flow
Exception flow
  • At step 4 if the instruction cannot pass the validation, the user would not get the "successfully finalized" status; instead, he/she will get the "invalid instruction" status.
  • At step 4 if the network is in "bad" condition, the user would get the "successfully finalized" status eventually, when the network will return in a "good" state.
Use case title
[FR0106] Creation of the multi-signature account in the Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user have permission to create new MST accounts

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares information about new account, including list of signatories and quorum of signatures
  2. The user creates new account in the Iroha network (<<include>> FR0101)
  3. The user receives result of new account creation from the Iroha peer
Postconditions
  • The new MST account with defined list of signatories and quorum is created
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if amount of signatories in the list is lower, than quorum, the Iroha peer returns "Not enough signatories" error; use case flow stops


Use case title
[FR0107] Changing quorum for the multi-signature account
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user have access to the account with permissions to control the target MST account

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the instruction with needed parameters for changing the quorum value
  2. The user sends the transaction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  3. The Iroha peer returns the results of instruction execution
Postconditions
  • The quorum for the target MST account was changed
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • If the new quorum is higher than amount of signatories, the Iroha peer will return "Not enough signatories" error message; use case flow stops.
Use case title
[FR0108] Changing list of signatories for the multi-signature account
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to change the list of signatories to the required account
  • The user has key pair for adding/deleting a signatory to/from the selected account

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the instruction of adding/deleting signatories for sending
  2. The user sends the transaction with the instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  3. The user receives the response from the Iroha peer
Postconditions
  • List of signatories for the selected account was changed correspondingly
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 2, if the signatory with the current key pair exists in the list of signatories in the target account, the Iroha peer will return "already added" error status; use case flow stops.
Use case title
[FR0109] Signing multi-signature transaction
Status

DISCUSS

Source
  1. Iroha 2 whitepaper
  2. Internal project by Iurii Vinogradov
Preconditions
  • There is a multi-signature account in the Iroha network
  • The user has access to the one or many key pairs for the multi-signature account
  • The current amount of signatures to the multi-signature transaction is lower than a current quorum value

Use case flow

  1. The user obtains the current list of pending transactions (<<include>> FR0203)
  2. The user finds the required transaction that can be signed by his/her signatures
  3. The user signs required transaction using the available key pair by calling the corresponding method from CLI or client SDK
  4. The user sends signed transaction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
Postconditions
  • Amount of signatures in the signed instruction increased by 1 signature
  • Signed instruction disappears from the list of pending instructions for the current user's account
Alternative flow
  • On step 2 the user can select more than one transactions, all of them can be sent on step 4 as a separate requests
  • The user can skip steps 1 and 2 if he/she already has information about the pending transaction, which was provided by any external integration. Hence, the user need to have possibility to start the use case directly from the step 3 by sending signed transaction without prior queries. (by Yuriy Vinogradov)
  • On step 3 the user can sign the transaction by more than one signature, and all of them can be sent as a single request per single transaction on step 4. In bridge implementation scenario is: 1. Selected bridge get all bridge instances signatures from the block and calls an Iroha2 ISI with the transfer information, attaching all bridge nodes signatures. It can be implemented as in Iroha1 by sending multple ISI calls in one transaction or batch, or it can be implemented as One ISI call with multiple signatures. Iurii Vinogradov
Exception flow
  • On step 1, in case of the empty list of pending transactions, the Iroha peer will return corresponding status and the use case flow stops
  • On step 3, if the user uses key pair, which was already used for signing the transaction, the CLI/SDK will return corresponding error status; use case flow stops if there are no more available key pairs. TBD (define, will it be available to do on the client-side?)


Use case title
[FR0110] Changing the conditions for the multi-signature account
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to change the conditions for the target multi-signature account

Use case flow

  1. The user requests the list of currently configured conditions for the target multi-signature account
  2. The user prepared the instruction with the list of conditions to be added/removed
  3. The user sends the transaction with the instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  4. The Iroha peer sends the response to the user
Postconditions
  • The list of conditions for the target multi-signature account was changed correspondingly
Alternative flow
Exception flow


Use case title
[FR0111] Assigning weights to the signatories of the multi-signature account
Status

DISCUSS

SourceBogdan Mingela
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to change the conditions (or some other, to discuss) for the target multi-signature account

Use case flow

  1. The user prepared the instruction with the map of public keys and weight correspondence (e.g. key1 → 50, i.e. key2 → 25, key3 → 25)
    and the target quorum (e.g. 50 so that it is needed either to sign upcoming transactions of the user with either key1 or both key2 and key3)
  2. The user sends the transaction with the instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  3. The Iroha peer sends the response to the user
Postconditions
  • The list of signatories weights and target quorum for the target multi-signature account was changed correspondingly
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flowN/A
Use case title
[FR0112] Associating and changing arbitrary data payload with the account
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has access to account with permissions to change data payload related to the target account

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the key and value of the data payload for forming the corresponding instruction
  2. The user sends the transaction with prepared instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  3. The Iroha peer returns results of instruction to the user
Postconditions
  • The data payload associated with the target account was changed correspondingly
Alternative flow
  • On step 2, if there was no such key associated with the target account, the key will be created 
  • On step 2, if some value is already associated with the provided key, the value will be overwritten
Exception flow
  • On step 2, if the size of payload data exceeds limit, the Iroha peer will return the "Too large data" error message; use case flow stops.
Use case title
[FR0113] Sending instruction with the payload
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has access to account with permissions to perform required instruction

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the instruction for the required operation and attached the payload to the instruction
  2. The user sends the transaction with prepared instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  3. The Iroha peer returns results of instruction execution to the user
Postconditions
  • The instruction with attached payload successfully executed and payload saved in the block storage
Alternative flow

N/A

Exception flow
  • On step 2, if the size of payload data exceeds limit, the Iroha peer will return the "Too large data" error message; use case flow stops.

02. Acquiring data from the Iroha network by queries

❇️❇️❇️

In this section all use cases related to retrieving data from the Iroha network will be described


Use case title
[FR0200] Acquiring data from the Iroha network by query
Status

DISCUSS

Source
  • Iroha 2 whitepaper
  • Generic functionality of Iroha
Preconditions
  • User has access to the account with permissions, which allows to get results of target query

Use case flow

  1. The user sends the query to the Iroha peer through the API
  2. The Iroha peer receives the query and validates its contents
  3. The Iroha peer checks that the user's account have enough permissions to get all data requested in query
  4. The Iroha peer collects information requested in query from the current WSV
  5. The Iroha peer creates Merkle tree for the obtained data TBD
  6. The Iroha peer returns the result of the operation to the user
Postconditions
  • User receives the response with the requested data
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 2, if the query was formed not correctly (for example, because of problems with the client library) the Iroha peer returns error with result of validation, use case execution stops.
  • On step 3, if the user's account does not have enough permissions, the Iroha peer returns error with corresponding status, use case execution stops.
Use case title
[FR0201] Acquiring the information about the selected account
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions

Use case flow


Postconditions
Alternative flow
Exception flow
Use case title
[FR0202] Acquiring of the current permissions for the selected account
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions

Use case flow


Postconditions
Alternative flow
Exception flow
Use case title
[FR0203] Acquiring a list of pending multi-signature instructions
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to request the list of pending transactions

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares query for requesting the list of the pending transaction
  2. The user sends the query to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0200)
  3. The user receives the list of currently pending multi-signature transaction   TBD  (should the Iroha expose all pending transactions, or we need to add the account ID / public key to filter the request?)
Postconditions
  • The user has the list of currently pending instructions
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if there are no currently pending transactions, the Iroha peer will return "empty response" status
Use case title
[FR0204] Acquiring a list of current conditions for a multi-signature account
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to request a list of conditions to the target multi-signature account

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares query for requesting a list of currently configured conditions of signing for the target multi-signature account
  2. The user sends the query to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0200)
  3. The user receives the list of currently configured conditions of signing for the target multi-signature account
Postconditions
  • The user received the list of conditions for the target account
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if there are no currently configured conditions, the Iroha peer will return "empty response" status
  • On step 3, if the account is not multi-signature, the Iroha peer will return "not applicable" status
Use case title
[FR0205] Acquiring a block by its number
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to request the block by its number

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares query for requesting the i-th block
  2. The user sends the query to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0200)
  3. The user receives the block description with all its' transactions etc
Postconditions
  • The user receives the requested block from the blockstore
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if there are no block specified, the Iroha peer will return "error/no such block" response
Use case title
[FR0206] Acquiring blocks subscription 
Status

DISCUSS (can be extended with a start block number index)

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to request blocks (subscription, can be separate permission or from <<include>> FR0205)

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares query for subscription of blocks
  2. The user establishes the subscription to the query results with the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0208)
  3. The user analyses the results of continuously received payload
Postconditions
  • The user has got stable channel for continuous block obtaining, which can be used for getting all new blocks on the current peer until the connection will be interrupted
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow

N/A

Use case title
[FR0207] Acquiring pending transactions subscription
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to request the list of pending transactions (subscription, can be separate permission or from <<include>> FR0203)

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares query for subscription for pending transactions
  2. The user established the subscription with the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0208)
  3. The user gets the connection to receive pending transactions within initialized 
Postconditions
  • The user has got stable pending transactions perception channel and newly arriving pending transactions
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flowN/A
Use case title
[FR0208] Subscribing on the query results
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to get results of the target query

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares request data for the target query
  2. The user establishes permanent connection to the Iroha peer and sends the query
  3. The Iroha peer confirms the connection and start sending updates on the query results until the user closes the connection
  4. The user receives the results and performs continuous analysis of the payload
Postconditions
  • The user has continuous results of query execution
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if the Iroha peer experiences issues with the network connection to other peers, the flow of results may be unplugged TBD
  • On step 3, if the user experiences issues with the network connection to the Iroha peer, the flow of results will be interrupted
  • On step 4, if permissions of current account, which the user uses for establishing subscription, changes and not longer allows to get the data requested by query, the Iroha peer interrupts the subscription; use case flow stops.
Use case title
[FR0209] Validate result of the query
Status

DISCUSS

Source

Kamil Salakhiev, Sora project (by Ruslan Rezin )

Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to get results of the target query

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares request data for the target query
  2. The user sends the query to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0200)
  3. The Iroha peer returns response containing result of the query as well as the Merkle proof of its validity and relation to the current block-store
  4. The user receives the response and validates the correctness of the data by checking Merkle proof and obtained data
Postconditions
  • The user has result of the query request with merkle proof of its validity
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 4, if the response was corrupted or changed, the user can find it by comparing results of data hashing with the Merkle proof. In that case, validation can be considered as failed.
Use case title
[FR0210] Query old Iroha state (e.g., query balance month ago)
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has access to account with permissions to get requested data at the current moment TBD
  • The user has access to account which had permissions to get requested data at the moment in the past, requested by the user

Use case flow

<<extends>> FR0200, substitutes step 4:

  1. The Iroha peer collects data from the block storage at the moment, requested in the query
Postconditions
  • The user received the requested information about the information in block store on the provided date
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 1, if there is no data for the requested query on the required date, the Iroha peer will return error response with corresponding state
Use case title
[FR0211] Querying list of accounts with the predefined filter
Status

DISCUSS - probably optional for MVP, if there will be another way for gathering data for the award calculation for liquidity providers in DEX solution

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to perform the query
  • The user has list of conditions which need to be used for filtering accounts

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the query and adds the filtering setup to the query body
  2. The user sends query to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0200)
  3. The Iroha peer returns result of the query execution to the user
Postconditions
  • The user has the list of accounts which satisfies entered filter
Alternative flow
  • On step 1, the user can include the query to the DSL sequence as a part of the complex instruction
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if the user does not have enough permissions, the Iroha peer returns "not enough permission" error status; the use case flow stops.
Use case title
[FR0212] Retrieving the list of keys of data payload, associated with the target account
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has access to account with permissions to retrieve data payload related to the target account

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the target account identifier for forming the corresponding query
  2. The user sends the transaction with prepared query to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0200)
  3. The Iroha peer returns results of query to the user, which contains the list of keys, associated with the target account
Postconditions
  • The user acquired list of keys of data payload associated with the target account 
Alternative flow

N/A

Exception flow
  • On step 2, if there is no keys associated with the target account, the Iroha peer will return "No data" status message; use case flow stops.
Use case title
[FR0213] Retrieving the value of data payload by the key, associated with the target account
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has access to account with permissions to retrieve data payload related to the target account

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the target account identifier and required key for forming the corresponding query
  2. The user sends the transaction with prepared query to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0200)
  3. The Iroha peer returns results of query to the user, which contains value of data payload, associated with target key on target account
Postconditions
  • The user acquired value of data payload, associated with target key on target account
Alternative flow

N/A

Exception flow
  • On step 2, if there is no such keys associated with the target account, the Iroha peer will return "Wrong key" error message; use case flow stops.
Use case title
[FR0214] Querying list of transactions with predefined filter
Status

DISCUSS - probably optional for MVP, if there will be another way for gathering data for the getting list of all transactions

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to perform the target query
  • The user has list of conditions which need to be used for filtering transactions (optionally)

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the query for getting list of transactions and adds the filtering data to the query body
  2. The user sends query to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0200)
  3. The Iroha peer returns result of the query execution to the user
Postconditions
  • The user has the list of transactions which satisfies the predefined filter with pagination
Alternative flow
  • On step 1, the filtering data can be optional; in that case the Iroha peer will return list of all transactions without any filtering
  • On step 1, the user can also include paging-related request into the query, in that case the Iroha peer will return the data correspondingly
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if the user does not have enough permissions, the Iroha peer returns "not enough permission" error status; the use case flow stops.
  • On step 3, if the user provided setup of filtering, which results in empty response, the Iroha peer will return "Empty response" status message; use case stops,
  • On step 3, if the user provided incorrect pagination-related request part, the Iroha peer will return "Incorrect pagination request" error message; use case stops.


Use case title
[FR0215] Subscription on incoming transactions
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to perform the target query of getting list of incoming transactions
  • The user has list of conditions which need to be used for filtering transactions

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the query for getting list of incoming transactions and adds the filtering data to get only incoming transactions
  2. The user sends query to the Iroha peer and subscribes on the results (<<include>> FR0208)
  3. The Iroha peer continuously returns result of the query execution to the user
  4. The user processes the incoming results of the query
  5. Eventually, the user interrupts the subscription with the Iroha peer, which stops the flow of data about incoming transactions
Postconditions
  • The user has all incoming transactions during the period when the subscription was active
Alternative flow
  • On step 1, the user can configure list of accounts, which should be used as filter for the query
Exception flow

N/A

03. Setting up and executing triggers

❇️❇️❇️

In this section all use cases related to triggers in the Iroha network will be described


Use case title
[FR0300] Setting up a trigger in the Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has permissions to setting up triggers in the Iroha network
  • The user has permissions to execute all instructions and queries which are included into the trigger body

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the list of instructions in form of DSL sequence
  2. The user prepares the instruction for sending trigger body to the Iroha peer
    1. The user can configure trigger to fire in manual mode only, by sending specific instruction to the Iroha peer;
    2. The user can configure trigger to fire when the temporal condition becomes true; condition can be based on the block number or block timestamp;
    3. The user can configure trigger to fire when the data condition becomes true; condition can be based on the data available by permissions to the author user; TBD (potential problem with the performance)
  3. The user sends the instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  4. The Iroha peer returns result of trigger setup to the user, which includes ID of the trigger which can be used to manually fire the trigger in future
  5. The Iroha peer checks the conditions of the triggers periodically; if the condition becomes true, the Iroha peer checks permissions of the author user and executes the trigger body
Postconditions
  • The trigger was configured and ready to fire
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 4, if the user does not have permissions to set up triggers and/or if there is not enough permissions to each command in the trigger body, the Iroha peer return "not enough permissions" error response; use case flow stops.
  • On step 5, if permissions of the author user would not allow for all instructions to execute (for example, if permissions of the author user was changed after creating the trigger), the whole trigger execution will be cancelled. TBD
Use case title
[FR0301] Manually firing the trigger
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The trigger was created and configured as "manual" by the FR0300
  • The user has permissions to fire the trigger
  • The user has ID of the target trigger

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the instruction to fire the target trigger
  2. The user sends the instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  3. The Iroha peer returns result of the target trigger execution
Postconditions
  • All instructions from the trigger body was executed and applied to the block storage
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if user does not have permissions to run all instructions in the Trigger, the Iroha peer returns "not enough permissions" status; use case flow stops.
Use case title
[FR0302] Removing the trigger
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The trigger was created by the FR0300
  • The user has permissions to remove the trigger
  • The user has ID of the target trigger

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the instruction to remove the trigger
  2. The user sends the instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  3. The Iroha peer returns results of the instruction to the user
Postconditions
  • The target trigger was removed from the list of active triggers
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if the user does not have enough permissions, the Iroha peer will return "not enough permissions" error status; use case flow stops

09. High-level use cases

❇️❇️❇️

In this section all high-level use cases will be described


Use case title
[FR0900] Configuration of fees for transfers inside the current Iroha network
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The network administrator have access to the account with permissions to configure fees in the current Iroha network

Use case flow

  1. The network administrator prepares the business-level description of the fee configuration
  2. The network administrator sets up the fee configuration using the format (or DSL) used in Iroha
  3. The network administrator prepares the instruction to change fee in the Iroha network
  4. The network administrator sends the prepared instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  5. The Iroha peer returns results of the instruction to the user
Postconditions
  • The fee configuration was changes according to the provided data
Alternative flowN/A
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if the user does not have enough permissions, the Iroha peer will return "not enough permissions" error status; use case flow stops
Use case title
[FR0901] Sending transaction with fees
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has access to the account with permissions to transfer assets to other account

Use case flow

  1. The user prepares the information about needed transfer of assets
  2. The user sends the query to the Iroha peer in the aim to get the needed structure of transaction, including all required fees (<<include>> FR0200)
    1. The response also contains the time frame until the provided information will be relevant.
  3. The user creates the transaction with all required instructions included within the provided time frame
  4. The user sends the prepared instruction to the Iroha peer (<<include>> FR0100)
  5. The Iroha peer returns results of the instruction to the user
Postconditions
  • The transfer instruction was successfully applied, together with all needed instructions for fees deduction.
Alternative flow
  • On step 3, if the time frame has passed, the user needs to request the information about fees again in the aim to create correct transaction
Exception flow
  • On step 3, if user sends the transaction within the time frame, there is a chance that fees will be changed and the transaction will be rejected; use case flow stops.
Use case title
[FR0902] Delegation of account control with time limit
Status

DISCUSS - could be after MVP

Source
Preconditions
  • The user has need to delegate full or partial control over the account to another account
  • (optionally) The user wants to limit the delegation period by time

Use case flow


Postconditions
  • The control over the user's account was delegated to the target account
Alternative flow
Exception flow
Use case title
[FR0903] Inheritance of the account after period of inactivity
Status

DISCUSS - could be after MVP

Source
Preconditions

Use case flow


Postconditions
Alternative flow
Exception flow

Non-functional requirements

Non-functional requirements (also named as "Quality attributes") describes the behavior of the system not directly related to the functions of the system, but answers the question "How system works?". The template for all quality attributes should follow the example (link to source):

Quality attribute name
[NFR0000] Example quality attribute; ID should be unique
Status

DISCUSS

DECIDED

POSTPONE

SourceSource (or list of sources) of the quality characteristic: project name / stakeholder name / document title (e.g., whitepaper) / etc.
Source of stimulusEntity, which initiates the stimulus, may be one of system users, another software system, etc.
StimulusCondition, which requires the response from the system
EnvironmentDefinition of specific conditions when stimulus occurs, and which is important for the result of response. Typical environment values are: normal operation, overload of requests, starting up the system, etc.
ArtifactParticular subject of stimulus, may be the whole system, some subset of parts or single part of the system.
ResponseResult of reaction of the system to the stimulus
Response measure

Measurable characteristic of the response, which can be checked for understanding how the system satisfies the requirements


00. Performance

Quality attribute name
[NFR0001] Transaction processing speed
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Source of stimulusClient applications of the Iroha network
StimulusClient application sends transactions to the Iroha network
EnvironmentNormal operation of the system
ArtifactWhole Iroha network
ResponseThe Iroha peer accepts the transactions and adds them to the blockchain
Response measureThe Iroha network should process at least 20.000 transactions per second


Quality attribute name
[NFR0001] Delay of block creation
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Source of stimulusClient applications of the Iroha network
StimulusClient application sends transactions to the Iroha network
EnvironmentNormal operation of the system
ArtifactWhole Iroha network
ResponseThe Iroha peer accepts the transactions and to the block
Response measureThe Iroha network should create new block each 2-3 seconds


Quality attribute name
[NFR0002] Delay of restarting the peer
Status

DISCUSS

Source
Source of stimulusAdministrator of the host with running Iroha peer
StimulusAdministrator restarts the Iroha peer (manually or automatically by external script)
EnvironmentNormal operation of the system; the block storage is not corrupted.
ArtifactCurrent Iroha peer
Response

The Iroha peer restarts and restores the WSV in the storage using one of two modes:

  • the fastInit mode, when all transactions are applied without the verification of the block storage consistency
  • the strictInit mode, when all transactions and blocks are verified to have correct signature and follow the business rules
Response measure

The Iroha peer successfully restarted, with following metrics:

  • for fastInit  mode:
    • restart should take not more than 50 (??) ms per block TBD
  • for strictInit  mode:
    • restart should take not more than 200 (??) ms per block TBD





Questions

Below is a list of questions to be addressed as a result of this requirements document:

QuestionOutcome

Not Doing

  • No labels