Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

  • Each submission is to be evaluated individually. A sample scoring sheet for each phase of the event is attached in this page.

  • Only 2 digits are considered in the aggregated score. The decimal point is rounded off to the nearest number to arrive at the final score upon aggregation.

  • In case if a jury member do not share results for a particular submission, the average of rest of the other jury is considered as an aggregate score. The reason for such incident shall be valid, for instance potential conflict of interest is considered valid. However, minimum number of juror evaluations will be done for each submission before aggregating the average score. This is to keep up the competitive spirit and give benefit of doubt to the participants.

  • Jury scores are not shared with each others and with public, until final evaluations are done.

  • Jury is free to ask additional questions to the team. 

Esteemed Jury Panel Evaluation

Ideation Phase

  1. Community leaders from across the globe will evaluate.

Prototype and Launch Phase

  1. Jury will consists of esteemed leaders from industries, academia and other organizations/institutions.

Public Popularity Voting

  • No labels