Page Comparison

(Update: November 7, 2024): The Task Force met on August 9, 2024 and concluded the following:

• Given the availability of both the OpenSSF scorecard and the CloMonitor, which between them cover all the project health criteria we could think of and more, there is no need to codify a set of badges for LFDT projects.
• Various criteria (see below) will be categorized and either fulfilment or score thresholds recommended for each as a health indicator.
• Project maintainers will be required to report these criteria (and wherever applicable, associated scores) in their annual reports. The TAC will evaluate the health of the projects and, at its discretion, determine whether or not a project ought to be moved from one stage to another (either a promotion or a demotion). A graph of the project's lifecycle annotated with criteria will be provided strictly as a guideline for the TAC.
• Recording:

The candidate list of badges proposed in Candidate List of Badges and Associated Project Lifecycle Stages are now somewhat obsolete, given the specific health indicators that can be tracked in a quantitative manner using OpenSSF scorecards as shown by David Enyeart in the following May 16, 2024 meeting (also see Meeting Minutes.)

...

Based on the new project lifecycle diagram created by the TOC in December 2023, here is an initial set of criteria for discussion.

Image RemovedImage Added

Transition Criteria Mapping to OpenSSF Scorecard Criteria

...

• Perhaps mention whenever an upgrade is due on the maintainers' Discord channel and expect that the maintainers of each project will submit a PR to upgrade the scorecard GitHub action.)

Meeting Recordings:

The above diagram was discussed in Task Force meetings, from which the above criteria mapping was drawn. Links to the meeting recordings are given below.

June 7, 2024

July 19, 2024

Widget Connector
url https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0tXdRQjyCs&t=7s