...

Links to Related Material

• Current project life cycle document

Resolved Topics/Issues

Issue 1: When do we know that a project is "done"? What are the end-of-life criteria? Agreed 8/8/2019

Issue 2: What are the criteria for a "First Major Release"? Agreed on 9/5/2019

Issue 3: What criteria/steps/policies must releases after the First Major Release adhere to? Agreed on 9/5/2019

Issue 4: Under what circumstances can a project be moved back to Incubation? to a lab? Agreed 7/25/2019

Issue 5: Should all projects be required to start as a lab prior to being proposed for Incubation?

Discussion Topics/Issues with proposed resolutions that don't seem controversial

Issue 1: When do we know that a project is "done"? What are the end-of-life criteria? Agreed 7/25/201

Issue 7: How/when does a project get officially names? Agreed 8/8/2019

Issue 8: How do we deal with a new project coming in that is already a shipping product for a company? Agreed 8/8/2019

Discussion Topics/Issues with proposed resolutions that don't seem controversial

N.A.

Discussion Topics/Issues that need more discussion

...

Issue 3: What criteria/steps/policies must releases after the First Major Release adhere to?Issue 6: Should we have subprojects (and fewer toplevel projects)?

Proposal	Incubation

·         

	First Major Release	Major Release: Maintenance	Deprecated	End of Life
Issue 5 Should all projects be required to start as a lab prior to being proposed for Incubation?

Proposed/Draft

Resolution 5: No. Projects can either start as a lab or be proposed to the TSC as a project entering Incubation. The TSC however may choose to direct a proposed project to a lab instead. Agreed

Issue 4 Under what circumstances can a project be moved back to Incubation? to a lab? (or what are the criteria for a project to be moved back to Incubation? to a lab?)

Proposed/Draft

Resolution 4: Until projects are moved to EOL they can stay in Incubation or Active status for an unlimited amount of time. Agreed Issue 8 How do we deal with a new project coming in that is already a shipping product for a company? Assuming it would need to pass Dave's proposed Project Readiness It could be a bad look for a company to donate shipping code and then have it wallow in incubation does it come in at the current shipping version ?

Proposed/Draft

Resolution 8: All new projects proposed to the TSC are considered to be starting in Incubation status. However, the Incubation exit criteria do not depend on any actual amount of time having been spent in Incubation. Whenever a project meets the Incubation exit criteria it can move to Active status. So, if a project happens to meet the Incubation exit criteria at the time a HIP is submitted to the TSC, the proposer of the project may submit a request to move to Active status at the same time. The project may then effectively move through Incubation immediately at the time it is accepted as a HIP. The same goes with the first major release. Agreed

Issue 2 What are the criteria for a "First Major Release"?

Proposed/Draft

Resolution 2: What are the criteria for a "First Major Release"? How does Dave's proposed Project Readiness fit in? FWIW, I created this set of criteria for the Fabric 1.0 release. Issue 7 How/when does a project get officially names? (Early → easier to set up repository, Later → marketing committee can be involved, see mailing list for discussion)

Proposed/Draft

Resolution 7: To start, a proposal should come with a temporary "code name" (e.g. a geographical location) that can be used for the repository with low risk of trademark violation. On approval, the marketing committee will work with the proposers to create a long term name and will do all the necessary checks. The repository name can be changed. Agreed

Issue 3 What criteria/steps/policies must releases after the First Major Release adhere to? Issue 6 Should we have subprojects (and fewer toplevel projects)? Proposed/Draft Resolution 6.1: No. Existing projects already have various forms of subprojects which are left under the governance of each project. There is no need for the TSC to get into that micromanagement of the projects and subprojects. Of course, if any conflict were to rise between a project and one or more of its subprojects the issue can be brought up to the TSC for arbitration. Proposed/Draft Related Resolution 6.2: Existing projects that were originally started via a HIP but that in practice are not being managed as "top level projects" will be officially rescinded from the top level nomination for house keeping purposes. Proposed/Draft Related Resolution 6.3: Projects that are dependent of one of the other projects should be folded under that project. This means Composer becomes Fabric Composer, Explorer becomes Fabric Explorer etc. Proposed/Draft Related Resolution 6.4: Subproject status and reporting should be reported through the top level project. For example, Fabric Explorer status would be included in the Fabric quarterly reports..

Issue 1

Proposed/Draft

Resolution 1.1: When a project, whether in Incubation or Active status, has not had any activities for over 6 months, it will be put on notice (via email to the project list) that it is on the path of being moved to "End of Life" (EOL) status. After an additional 6 months have passed, if no activity has taken place, pending TSC approval, the project will effectively be moved to EOL. Software releases and quarterly TSC reports will be considered as signs of "activities". Agreed

Proposed/Draft

Resolution 1.2: Project Maintainers may submit to the TSC a request for moving their project to EOL. Pending TSC approval, a notification will be sent out to the project mailing list that the project is being placed on the path to EOL. After 6 months have passed, if no one has objected, pending TSC approval, the project will effectively be moved to EOL. Agreed

Comments

Hart:

I'd like our project lifecycle to satisfy three basic requirements:

...