Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
| Introductions | Everyone | - Note: No one wanted to be introduced.
|
15 min | Pull-request about Karma+Webpack based browser tests (PR#245) | Peter | - Abstract: Peter prepared a plan of browser tests of the common package.
- Discussion point: Questions about Cactus's role happened. Cactus is a server-side application, not client-side.
|
20 min | Manual consortium plugin (PR#242) | Peter | - Abstract: Peter prepared a plan of manual consortium plugin
- Discussion point: Who is the consortium members of consortium plugin?
- Note: Shingo Fujimoto proposed the following material (The conclusion is discussed with this topic)
|
20 min | Federation on blockchain integrated service related to the topic (PR#242) | Shingo | - Abstract: Shingo prepared a plan of federation of blockchain integrated service.
View file |
---|
name | Cactus_FederationDiscussion_Shingo20200810.pdf |
---|
page | 2020-08-10 Meeting notes |
---|
space | cactus |
---|
height | 250 |
---|
|
- Discussion point: The function (registry for trustworthy validators) is almost similar to consortium plugin as as Peter Somogyvari proposed. The difference is where is the trust point. The registry should not be admin's one.
- Consensus: The discussion continues to the next week.
|
5 min | Academic paper: current contributors, initial ideas | Many | - Consensus: We should design the Cactus architecture at first. After this, we will summarize the output to academic paper.
|
| PR Discussion | Peter/Many | - Note: Meeting time is over then this is postponed to the next week.
|