Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Added recording

Recording:

...

dummyfile.txt

Date

Attendees

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
IntroductionsEveryone
  • Note: No one wanted to be introduced.
15 minPull-request about Karma+Webpack based browser tests (PR#245)Peter
  • Abstract: Peter prepared a plan of browser tests of the common package.
  • Discussion point: Questions about Cactus's role happened.  Cactus is a server-side application, not client-side.
20 minManual consortium plugin (PR#242)Peter
  • Abstract: Peter prepared a plan of manual consortium plugin
  • Discussion point: Who is the consortium members of consortium plugin?
  • Note: Shingo Fujimoto proposed the following material (The conclusion is discussed with this topic)
20 minFederation on blockchain integrated service related to the topic (PR#242)Shingo
  • Abstract: Shingo prepared a plan of federation of blockchain integrated service.
    View file
    nameCactus_FederationDiscussion_Shingo20200810.pdf
    page2020-08-10 Meeting notes
    spacecactus
    height250
  • Discussion point: The function (registry for trustworthy validators) is almost similar to consortium plugin as as Peter Somogyvari proposed. The difference is where is the trust point.  The registry should not be admin's one. 
  • Consensus:  The discussion continues to the next week.
5 minAcademic paper: current contributors, initial ideasMany
  • Consensus:  We should design the Cactus architecture at first.  After this, we will summarize the output to academic paper.

PR DiscussionPeter/Many
  • Note: Meeting time is over then this is postponed to the next week.

Action items

  •