Summary:
...
Excerpt |
---|
Useful work updates. Lots of volunteers to push forward projects like the HIPE for payment decorators, migration to Ursa, PR reviews, GitLab migration, language specific libraries, and static code analysis. |
Remember:
Attendees:
...
- Sergey Minaev, Evernym
- Stephen Curran, Cloud Compass/BC Gov
- Sam Curren, Sovrin
- Thomas Shelton, CU Ledger
- Steve McCowan
- Mike Lodder, Sovrin Foundation
- Richard Esplin, Evernym
Release Status:
April: Indy SDK 1.8.3
- Bug fixes for auth_rules
- May: Indy SDK 1.9.0
- Transaction Author Agreement API
- Wallet Entities Deletion
Work Updates:
- Language specific libraries: some repos now exist, but we need more maintainers
- GitLab migration
- Sergey shared a set of challenging use cases with Mike that we need help with.
- Jenkins pipeline configures docker instance within the pipeline. GitLab would need to store the images which will take too much space.
- How to do mobile builds and testing: hardware versus software emulators.
- Will migrate indy-sdk after migrating LibSovToken.
- We don't currently use any orchestration, so no need to migrate to K8s
- Most complicated step is the Windows SDK where it tests against a slave pool
- Sergey shared a set of challenging use cases with Mike that we need help with.
- SDK 2.0 architecture
- Credentials Exchange Hype
- Updates to main PR: https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-hipe/pull/89
- Ready to push for acceptance in #indy-maintainers? (Instead of waiting for the next meeting.)
- Before acceptance, need to process the feedback from the Indy Agent call.
- Sergey's draft of payments as part of credential exchange: https://github.com/KitHat/indy-hipe/pull/1
- Sam's draft: https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-hipe/pull/129
- Should be a separate HIPE because the payment decorator could apply to any message family (though it can be a required part of the protocol)
- Payment section of VCX HIPE should refer to "decorators as documented in a different HIPE", and clarify which messages use the decorator.
- Updates to main PR: https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-hipe/pull/89
Other Open PRs:
- PR 1578: Ursa PR has been reviewed 3 people now. Our goal is to get this merged in May.
- PR 1581: Ian reviewed, and changes are needed. Should be marked WIP.
- PR 1587: Verify proof request restrictions
- PR 1454: Ready to merge design for cached credentials for offline proofs. Interested people should review it and add final comments.
- Plans for older pull requests: either need to finish them or reject them.
Other Business:
- Language specific libraries:
- indy-sdk-python: Sam Curren
- indy-sdk-ruby: John Callahan
- indy-sdk-go: someone needs to invite the person who submitted the PRs (Stephen Ephraim or someone from SecureKey?)
- indy-sdk-ios vs indy-sdk-swift + indy-sdk-objectivec: Norm is willing, but someone else will understand IOS development better (especially with Swift).
- Need to resolve how indy-sdk-ios relates to libvcx
- rejected the approach of separate repos for indy-sdk-swift + indy-sdk-objectivec
- indy-sdk-java: Thomas Shelton
- Need to resolve how Java wrapper relates to libvx
- Need a separate repo and maintainer for indy-sdk-android
- indy-sdk-dotnet: Tomislav?
- Can also produce Android and IOS
- Dealing with warnings from rust cargo clippy
- Mike will do the initial review, then escalate concerns to this group.
- Ignore a line? #![deny(clippy::all)]
- Ursa found that it prevented compilation in some cases
- What data analysis do we want to do with the output?
- Should we recommend pylint on Node / Plenum?