Summary
Excerpt |
---|
|
...
This specification creating group operates under the Linux Foundation Community Specification License v1.0.
Hyperledger is committed to creating a safe and welcoming community for all. For more information please visit the Hyperledger Code of Conduct. |
---|
Meeting Attendees
Stephen Curran (BC Gov / Cloud Compass Computing Inc.) <swcurran@cloudcompass.ca>
...
- Eliminating having a special `@context` for AnonCreds
- Issue: https://github.com/hyperledger/anoncreds-spec/issues/192
- HackMD: https://hackmd.io/@BYJVN-mpSCe5H3eaIw7-7g/ryk4dvIIp
- Presentation
- Updates Discuss the updates needed to implement the changes
- Idea: Having a commit-time "config" setting for 1.0 vs. 2.0 .(or can we do better?)
- Aries Issue Credential / Present Proof Attachments
- Current: Indy, JSON-LD - which do we use, or should we define another that (also) handles JWTs?
- HackMD: https://hackmd.io/JEIOxf_ETnaX33kTIu7YJw?view
- Open discussion
Future Calls
To Dos:
- Issue to talking about what AnonCreds verifies and what is left to the issuer to verify.
- Revocation Interval
- Approach to determine if the holder used an acceptable RevRegistry – see this Issue comment
- Who calls the AnonCreds method to get the Revocation Registry from the ledger for verification
- Verifier
or AnonCreds?
- Verifier
- To set "validation" to true/false based on the RevRegEntry timestamp in relation to the revocation interval? Presentation
- Key points:
- 1. an RevRegEntry is “current” from the time it is written, to the time of the next RevRegEntry
- 2. “within the interval” is based on when a RevRegEntry is “current” (see 1.), not its timestamp.
- 3. AnonCreds or the Verifier (calling AnonCreds) should calculate “within interval” (using 2.) and mark verification true if the RevRegEntry used by the Prover is within the interval, else false.
- Dangers:
- False-Negatives: If a strict "timestamp used is between from, to" and not based on when a RevReg is "current" (per 2.), we will get "not verified" incorrectly.
- False-Positives: If we don't do any checking of the timestamp and the interval, the holder could incorrectly use an old RevRegEntry.
- Dangers:
- 4. General point: AnonCreds should return both a summary (true/false) and if false, additional data about why it was false.
- Decision – add an optional `at_from_ts` set of entries, one per NRP, that AnonCreds can use for determining if the holder_ts is within the Presentation Request interval.
...